“There is not one redeeming feature in our superstition of Christianity. It has made one half of the world fools, and the other half hypocrites.” Thomas Jefferson
One of my Facebook friends posted this today and it got a boatload of "Likes" which is no surprise considering the alarming traction a faction of fundamentalist Christianity has gained in the highest echelons of the Republican party with viable, mainstream candidates dancing around science as if it were the enemy and a liberal conspiracy.
To complicate matters, the silence of rational conservatives is deafening which is why a Tweet like Jon Huntsman's goes viral. It's not because he said anything particularly revolutionary; it's that he said anything about science at all which is increasingly outside the mainstream of the Republican party. Furthermore, many contemporary conservative analysts have developed a disturbing penchant for reducing homosexuals, immigrants and the poor to bizarre caricatures which play on virtually every fear that has shown up in uncertain times throughout history.
So, we're left with is distortions, assumptions and reductionism and what Andrew Sullivan calls, "Christianism," which is not a religion, but a political ideology.
Yet, to take a quote like Jefferson's and post it on Facebook without any context is its own sort of reduction as Jefferson was earnest in his desire to tease through the distortions and obfuscations of the Gospel writers in order to get to the authentic sayings of Jesus. (In the interest of full disclosure, I'm teaching an online class called "Coming Home, A New Way of Being Christian," a course which has been informed by the Beatitudes, philosopher Ken Wilber, the Jesus Seminar, Stages of Faith, evolutionary science and contemplative Christian teachers like Cynthia Bourgeault. So, I do have a bias here although it's rooted more in a resolve to clarify distortions than any desire to convert).
Jefferson was pointing to the obvious: religion (and in this case, Christianity) produces no small bevy of "fools and hypocrites" capable of using the sacred texts to project their psychological shadow onto the chosen "out" groups and promote a political agenda focused on some sort of power dominance rooted in the One True Way.
Yet, my Facebook friend may know not know about the letter Jefferson wrote to John Adams about the teachings of Jesus. He wrote:
"The whole history of these books (the Gospels) is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text…that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine."
But he also wrote:
In the New Testament, there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and other parts are of the fabric of inferior minds."
He called himself a Christian of sorts (with caveats). His words:
To the corruptions of Christianity, I am opposed; but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself, I am in Christian in the only sense in which he wanted anyone to be: sincerely attached to his doctrines, in preference to all others; ascribing every human excellence and believing his never claimed another."
Jefferson's use of the term, "tricks" points to the same discoveries made by the Jesus Seminar: the texts have been altered, deleted, distorted. Many texts like the Gospel of Thomas and Gospel of Mary Magdalene were hidden and they speak of a very different, rather Buddhist sounding Jesus. You have to do some sleuth work and spiritual practice to tease out the inner meanings of the essential teachings of Jesus.
With that said, the point is this: when you fight reductionism with more reductionism you still end up with distortions and risk falling into some other expression of Jefferson's "foolishness and hypocrisy."
There are countless Christians out there of every stripe. Some of them are scientific, non-theistic rationalists (you'll find them mostly in Unitarian churches), some are social justice evangelicals (found in places like Sojourners and The Simple Way movement), some are postmodern Oneness folks who see the Christ or Spirit in all religions (found often in Unity churches).
Some are living the Beatitudes in forgotten developing countries serving the poor, healing the sick, building wells and gardens (described often in Nick Kristof's columns), some are contemplatives in and outside of monasteries and some are psycho-spiritual Jungians (found in the writings of my deceased friend, Fr. Lou).
They are Greek, Russian and Syrian Orthodox and they are Chinese people at all stages of faith holding secret prayer meetings in communist China.
Some are integralists who are a sort of an evolutionary amalgamation of the above who see Christianity as an ancient tradition rooted in the spiritual practices of Jesus. This includes meditation, contemplation, self-reflection, conscious work and creation of post-traditional community which focuses on service to others and to the earth itself.
It is rooted in remembering that the love for which we long is already present in the innermost Sabbath of our hearts and not far away in some distant heaven waiting for our death.
Like many Christian expressions, it births a humility in the limits, the possibilities and the responsibilities of our incarnation. It lives side by side (and in my case, in the same home) with atheists, yogis, Muslims, Buddhists, Democrats, Republicans, agnostics, gay people and immigrants. It lives itself into answers which become questions again because that's the nature of incarnation and the nature of a living energy we call the cosmic Christ. Many in this movement don't go to traditional church and have redefined what church is to them.
But, please let's not reduce all Christians to the political Christianism of Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry for this is it's own kind of foolishness. Nor reduce it to a Catholic structure which refuses to evolve past patriarchal notions of women, sex and power.
Many non-Christians have a boatload of shadow work to do when it comes to their own individual and collective Christian wounds. (Shadow work, for those unfamiliar with the term, is rooted in the psychological notion of projection in which you see in others what you've denied in yourself).
So, here's the challenge: Ask yourself or someone you know the question asked by the Master himself: Who do YOU say that I am? Pay attention to whether the answer opens their hearts to themselves and others. Pay attention to the vast array of answers and to the lived lives born out of those answers. An antidote to untested assumptions is simple curiosity about the life of another.
Hold the paradox and the complexity of perspectives you'd never considered. There's a value in being discriminating and careful when drawing conclusions. This is what grown ups do. And right now, the world desperately needs grown ups.